Ujjivan Finance | Results Overview | Q1 FY20
Wishing you all a very happy Dasara. Ujjivan’s Q2 FY20 results are just around the corner. Before these results come out, let us have a quick look at the Q1 FY20 numbers. But before looking into the results, I recommend that you have a look at the following links (in case you have not read them yet).
Financial Analysis
The table below shows the financial performance of Ujjivan Finance for Q1 of FY20. We compare the results with Q1 of FY19. The P&L numbers look great. This is partly due to a lower base effect.
Q1 FY20 (Crores) | Q1 FY19 (Crores) | % Change | |
Revenue (including other Income) | 689 | 427 | 61.3% |
Expenses | 562 | 387 | 45.2% |
Profit before taxes | 127 | 70 | 81.1% |
Profit after taxes | 83 | 46 | 80.4% |
Expenses:
The table below compares the expenses for Q1 FY20 and Q1 FY19. I did not see any major cause of concern in the expense items.
Expense Item | Q1 FY20 (Crores) | Q1 FY19 (Crores) | % Change |
Finance costs | 263 | 161 | 63% |
Employee expense | 163 | 115 | 41.7% |
Other expenses | 83 | 92 | -11% |
Impairment losses | 19 | 6 | 216% |
Other Numbers
- Cost-to-Income: Cost to income is dropping. Since the branch conversions are more or less complete, the costs should stabilize from here hence the cost to income should also see a reduction (with increase in income in future)
Q1 FY20 | Q4 FY19 | Q3 FY19 | Q2 FY19 | Q1 FY19 | |
Cost-to-Income | 64.4% | 78.0% | 77.7% | 77.4% | 72.3% |
- Net Interest Margin: The NIM (consolidated) came in at 12 percent which is pretty good.
Q1 FY20 | Q4 FY19 | Q3 FY19 | Q2 FY19 | |
NIM | 12% | 11.7% | 11.8% | 12.0% |
- Return on Equity: ROE was fairly good in Q1. The management expects to reach and sustain an ROE of 18% in another three to four years.
Q1 FY20 | Q4 FY19 | Q3 FY19 | Q2 FY19 | |
ROE | 17.4% | 13.3% | 9.7% | 9.7% |
- Gross Non-performing Asset (GNPA) The GNPA and NNPA are at manageable levels.
Q1 FY20 | Q4 FY19 | Q3 FY19 | Q2 FY19 | Q1 FY19 | Q4 FY18 | Q3 FY18 | Q2 FY18 | |
GNPA | 0.8% | 0.9% | 1.4% | 1.9% | 2.7% | 3.6% | 4.24% | 4.99% |
NNPA | 0.3 | 0.3% | 0.3% | 0.3% | 0.3% | 0.7% | 1.04% | 1.38% |
- Employee Strength: There is a noticeable increase in the employee strength in Q1 FY20.
Q1 FY20 | Q4 FY19 | Q3 FY19 | Q2 FY18 | Q1 FY19 | Q4 FY18 | Q3 FY18 | |
Employee strength | 15,626 | 14,757 | 14,305 | 13,169 | 12,295 | 11,242 | 10881 |
- Customer Base: The number of customers of Ujjivan stands at 47.2 lakh active borrowers. The company has started to add new customers at a decent pace. Good to see the confidence is back and the company is able to lend to new customers.
Q1 FY20 | Q4 FY19 | Q3 FY19 | Q2 FY19 | Q1 FY19 | Q4 FY18 | Q3 FY18 | Q2 FY18 | |
Customer base (lakh) | 47.2 | 46.1 | 41.4 | 40.3 | 36.9 | 37.1 | 37.13 | 36.64 |
Borrowing Profile
- Borrowing profile provides details on the various sources of borrowings for Ujjivan and the composition of these instruments in the overall borrowing mix. In Q1 FY19, the management had hoped that the deposits will constitute about 75-80% of the total borrowing profile. The company is getting there slowly and steadily.
Type of Lender | Q1 FY20 | Q4 FY19 | Q3 FY19 | Q2 FY19 | Q1 FY19 | Q4 FY18 | Q3 FY18 | Q2 FY18 | Q1 FY18 | Q4 FY17 |
Term Loan (banks/NBFC) | 2% | 2% | 2% | 5% | 12% | 16% | 25% | 39% | 55% | 63% |
Refinancing Facility | 29% | 31% | 34% | 39% | 31% | 26% | 24% | 21% | 18% | 15% |
NCD | 0% | 1% | 1% | 6% | 8% | 8% | 9% | 9% | 9% | 12% |
Deposits | 65% | 62% | 58% | 49% | 49% | 49% | 35% | 20% | 6% | 3% |
Others | 3% | 4% | 5% | 2% | 0% | 0% | 8% | 11% | 12% | 7% |
- Due to the above borrowing mix, over the past few quarters, the cost of borrowing has been coming down for the company.
Item | Q1 FY20 | Q4 FY19 | Q3 FY19 | Q2 FY19 | Q1 FY19 | Q4 FY18 | Q3 FY18 | Q2 FY18 |
Average Cost of borrowing (including Deposits) | 8.5% | 8.5% | 8.5% | 8.5% | 8.6% | 9.0% | 9.3% | 9.61% |
Loan Book Analysis
Loan Book Composition: The loan book composition numbers are given below. The company is consciously moving away from MFI which is evident from the growth in Housing, MSE, Rural and specifically the other segment (which comprises of loans like 2 wheeler loans etc).
- By the way the management expects the MFI loans (including Group loans and Individual loans) to make up about 70% of the loan book by FY21. The long term target for MFI vs non-MFI is a 50 : 50 split.
- Housing loan book Growth: There was a marked growth in housing loan book. The company touched 1000 crore loan book for housing loan. The company is focusing its credit lending more on the ‘ready to move’ homes which provide the comfort of safety as the houses are more or less complete.
Loan Book Composition | Q1 FY20 (Crores) | Q1 FY19 (crores) | Growth (%) | Q4 FY19 (Crores) |
Group Loans | 8444 | 6338 | 33.2% | 8311 |
Micro Individual Loans | 927 | 683 | 35.7% | 857 |
Micro-Small Enterprise | 686 | 280 | 145% | |
Housing | 1007 | 417 | 141.4% | 830 |
Rural | 287 | 42 | 583.3% | 185 |
Other | 432 | 27 | 1500% | 275 |
Loan Disbursements: Loan disbursements gives us a dynamic view of the loan book. The table below shows the loan disbursement details. Again, the emphasis on non-MFI loan disbursements is quite evident.
Loans Disbursed | Q1 FY20 (Crores) | Q1 FY19 (Crores) | Growth (%) | Q4 FY19 (Crores) |
Group Loan | 2092 | 1720 | 21.6% | 2805 |
Micro Individual Loans | 230 | 151 | 52.3% | 285 |
Micro-Small Enterprise | 141 | 76 | 85.5% | 185 |
Housing | 205 | 108 | 89.8% | 195 |
Rural | 115 | 18 | 538.8% | 107 |
Others | 175 | 150 |
The other metric worth looking at is the average ticket size of the loan. The ticket size for MSE and Housing loans have been going up. Personally, I prefer fewer loans with larger ticket size. It leads to efficient management of client base (provided the customers are credit worthy).
- MSE Loan ticket size: Within a few quarters the MSE ticket size has gone up from 3.2 lakhs to 12.6 which is a fourfold increase! That is quite a leap. One reason for the increase in the ticket size for MSE loan is because the company has moved to a completely securitized loan book for MSE loans. This gives them room to increase their ticket size as the loans are backed by collaterals.
Average Ticket Size | Q1 FY20 | Q4 FY19 | Q3 FY19 | Q2 FY19 | Q1 FY19 | Q4 FY18 | Q3 FY18 | Q2 FY18 |
Group Loan (Rs.) | 32,146 | 31,363 | 31,517 | 29,506 | 30,192 | 26,828 | 27,591 | 24,677 |
Micro Individual Loans (Rs.) | 87,778 | 87,531 | 81,976 | 80,929 | 79,545 | 75,518 | 75,646 | 73,893 |
Micro-Small Enterprise (Rs.) | 12,60,000 | 10,10,000 | 7,40,000 | 5,80,000 | 5,21,620 | 3,46,830 | 3,47,040 | 3,27,816 |
Housing (Rs.) | 9,80,000 | 9,40,000 | 9,10,000 | 9,30,000 | 8,26,000 | 6,31,213 | 6,41,463 | 5,79,447 |
Small Finance Bank
- Ujjivan currently has 474 branches with 50 asset centers pending conversion to SFBs. Compared to Q4 FY19 there was no change in the branch count in the first quarter.
- Deposits now form close to 65% of all the borrowings. Let us try to dissect the deposit numbers.
Deposit Type | Q1 FY20 Crores or % | Q4 FY19 Crores of % | Q3 FY19 Crores or % | Q2 FY19 Crores or % | Q1 FY19 Crores or % | Q4 FY18 Crores or % | Q3 FY18 Crores or % |
Retail CASA
Retail Term Deposit |
827 Crores
2616 Crores |
784 Crores
1955 Crores |
561 Crores
1384 Crores |
377 Crores
936 Crores |
239 Crores
511 Crores |
138 Crores
289 Crores |
90 Crores
168 Crores |
Institutional Deposits | 4267 Crores | 3,658 Crores | 2,468 Crores | 1714 Crores | 1307 Crores | 1179 Crores | 799 crores |
Certificate of Deposit | 247 Crores | 982 Crores | 963 Crores | 1162 Crores | 1746 Crores | 2166 Crores | 1379 Crores |
CASA to Total Deposits | 10.4% | 10.6% | 10.4% | 9% | 6.28% | 3.65% | 3.69% |
Retail to Total Deposits | 43.1% | 37.1% | 36.2% | 31.3% | 19.72% | 11.32 | 10.58% |
Average cost of Deposits | 8.0% | 7.8% | 7.8% | 7.5% | 7% |
Regarding Listing of Small Finance Bank (USFB):
One of the hot topics for the company is the listing of the SFB. Below is my understanding of how the entire listing mess will unravel.
- Let us assume the share capital (in terms of number of shares) for the existing company i.e. UFSL = 1000 shares.
- Out of these 1000 shares, Let us assume that number of shares that I own of UFSL = 20 shares
- Now assume that USFB (i.e. the small finance bank subsidiary) will do a 10 percent dilution via IPO in Jan 2020.
- So number of shares allotted in IPO = 100 shares of USFB. Total shares of USFB would be 1100 shares.
- UFSL would own 1000 shares out of the 1100 shares of USFB.
- New shareholders will own the rest 100 shares out of the 1100 shares of USFB.
- So number of shares allotted in IPO = 100 shares of USFB. Total shares of USFB would be 1100 shares.
With the above assumption in mind the following would happen.
- I continue to hold my 20 shares out of 1000 shares of UFSL, but I will NOT directly own any of the 1000 shares of USFB (UFSL will own them).
- Hence, I indirectly own 20 shares of UFSB (i.e. via UFSL).
- After five years of listing of UFSL (i.e. in another two years), there might be a reverse merger of UFSL with USFB and I might get 20 shares of USFB (assuming RBI AGREES\APPROVES, and the existing USFB shareholders approve as well)
Summary
- Revenue and profit growth were pretty good. This was partly due to base effect.
- Cost-to-income has dropped noticeably in Q1. I hope the company manages to bring it down further.
- ROE improved in Q1 to about 17%. The guidance for ROE for FY20 is about 14% (as indicated in Q4 FY19).
- Both the NPA and provisioning numbers are very encouraging.
- Customer base growth and employee count growth is a positive sign for future growth.
- Borrowing profile continues to tilt towards retail deposits. Again a very good sign.
- Loan book growth and disbursement growth were primarily focused on MSE and Housing segments. I was very happy to see the ticket size increase for MSE segment.
Q1 FY20 was a very consistent quarter. Good to see such positive numbers being reported by the company.
Disclaimer
I am not a SEBI registered research analyst. The information provided above is my subjective view based on what I have read on different websites, annual reports, and quarterly reports of various companies which I assume to be accurate. The above information should not be treated as an offer/advise to purchase a specific stock/investment instrument. Since these are my subjective opinions, I could be wrong in my understanding or presentation of information. I do not claim that the above information is complete or can be relied upon as such. I cannot be held responsible for any loss or damage caused due to any inadvertent error in the above information. I will not be liable for investment decisions made by readers of this article based on the above information. I am not an investment advisor. I may or may not have position in the above company. Please consult your investment advisor for all your investment needs.
Leave a Reply